2024 Mitsubishi
|
2024 Volvo
|
|
| MPG - City | Info not available | Info not available |
| MPG - Hwy | Info not available | Info not available |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space | 64.3 ft3 | 49.0 ft3 |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | Four Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive, Rear Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 248 hp | 248 - 402 hp |
| Towing Capacity | 1,500 lbs | 3,970 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 185.4 in | 174.8 in |
| Exterior Width | 84.4 in | 75.2 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 38.1 in |
Front 40.9 in
Rear 36.1 in |
| Head Room |
Front 39.8 - 40.6 in
Rear 37.4 - 39.1 in |
Front 39.4 in
Rear 36.7 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
Rear passengers will be able to stretch out a lot more in the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV than in the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric.
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV will be popular with taller drivers and passengers in the front seat, due to its greater front head- and legroom than the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). Clearly, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is a better financial choice over the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric, when considering MSRP.
Dimensions
Since the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is much wider than the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric, finding a wide enough spot in a parking lot may be a bit more challenging.
If you go with the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, you may be circling the block looking for a space large enough to park more often than with the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric.
Handling
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV has a smaller turning radius than the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric, allowing you to more easily maneuver in and out of tight spots.
Performance
In terms of towing capacity, the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric is clearly the choice over the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV for pulling heavy loads.
In terms of horsepower, it's a virtual tie between the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric.
Powertrain
With somewhat higher torque, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV transmits power to its wheels a bit more effectively than the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric.
Utility
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV offers greater seating capacity than the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric, making it a better choice for those who find themselves chauffeuring others around.
With the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, you'll be able to haul more equipment or luggage than the Volvo C40 Recharge Pure Electric.