2025 Mazda
|
2025 Toyota
|
|
| MPG - City | 23 - 24 MPG | 19 - 20 MPG |
| MPG - Hwy | 28 MPG | 24 - 26 MPG |
| Seating Capacity | 6 - 8 seats | 5 - 7 seats |
| Cargo Space | 74.2 - 75.2 ft3 | 90.2 ft3 |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | Four Wheel Drive, Rear Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 280 - 340 hp | 278 hp |
| Towing Capacity | 3,500 - 5,000 lbs | 6,000 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 201.6 in | 194.9 in |
| Exterior Width | 77.6 in | 77.9 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.4 in |
Front 41.8 in
Rear 34.8 in |
| Head Room |
Front 39.2 - 39.7 in
Rear 38.4 - 39.3 in |
Front 39.7 in
Rear 37.8 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
Rear passengers will be able to stretch out a lot more in the Mazda CX-90 than in the Toyota 4Runner.
As far as headroom and legroom go, there's not much difference between front seat comfort in the Mazda CX-90 and the Toyota 4Runner.
Convenience
You'll be making about the same number of stops at the gas station with the Mazda CX-90 as you will with the Toyota 4Runner, as they are both able to travel similar distances on a tank of gas.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). When looking only at MSRP, the Mazda CX-90 will have less of an impact on your bank account than the Toyota 4Runner.
Dimensions
The Mazda CX-90 is about the same width as the Toyota 4Runner.
For some people, bigger is better. If that's the case for you, then you'll be happier with the Mazda CX-90, which is slightly longer than the Toyota 4Runner.
Handling
The Mazda CX-90 has a larger turning radius than the Toyota 4Runner, making it slightly more difficult to maneuver in and out of tight spots.
Performance
In terms of towing capacity, the Toyota 4Runner is clearly the choice over the Mazda CX-90 for pulling heavy loads.
In terms of horsepower, it's a virtual tie between the Mazda CX-90 and the Toyota 4Runner.
Powertrain
With somewhat higher torque, the Mazda CX-90 transmits power to its wheels a bit more effectively than the Toyota 4Runner.
Utility
The Mazda CX-90 offers greater seating capacity than the Toyota 4Runner, making it a better choice for those who find themselves chauffeuring others around.
The Mazda CX-90 has significantly less cargo capacity than the Toyota 4Runner.