2024 Jeep
|
2025 Mazda
|
|
| MPG - City | 13 - 20 MPG | 23 - 25 MPG |
| MPG - Hwy | 16 - 23 MPG | 29 - 31 MPG |
| Seating Capacity | 4 - 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space | 31.7 - 72.4 ft3 | 56.3 ft3 |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic, Manual | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | Four Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 270 - 470 hp | 187 - 227 hp |
| Towing Capacity | 2,000 - 3,500 lbs | 2,000 - 3,500 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 166.8 - 188.4 in | 185.8 in |
| Exterior Width | 73.9 in | 75.6 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 40.8 - 41.2 in
Rear 35.7 - 38.3 in |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.8 in |
| Head Room |
Front 40.8 - 42.6 in
Rear 40.3 - 41.7 in |
Front 38.6 - 39.1 in
Rear 37.5 - 38.6 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
The Jeep Wrangler offers a bit more room for passengers in the back seat than the Mazda CX-50.
The Jeep Wrangler will be popular with taller drivers and passengers in the front seat, due to its greater front head- and legroom than the Mazda CX-50.
Convenience
You'll be making about the same number of stops at the gas station with the Jeep Wrangler as you will with the Mazda CX-50, as they are both able to travel similar distances on a tank of gas.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). The Jeep Wrangler will definitely make more of a dent in your wallet than the Mazda CX-50, which has a much lower MSRP.
Dimensions
Since the Jeep Wrangler is much slimmer than the Mazda CX-50, it'll be much easier to find a wide enough space in a crowded parking lot.
When looking at overall length, the Jeep Wrangler takes up about the same amount of space in your garage as the Mazda CX-50.
Handling
The Jeep Wrangler has a larger turning radius than the Mazda CX-50, making it slightly more difficult to maneuver in and out of tight spots.
Performance
When considering towing capacity, the Jeep Wrangler is clearly the choice over the Mazda CX-50 for pulling heavy loads.
When it comes to horsepower, the Jeep Wrangler greatly out-muscles the Mazda CX-50.
Powertrain
Due to its much higher torque, the Jeep Wrangler does a much better job of transmitting its engine's horsepower to its wheels than the Mazda CX-50.
Utility
In terms of seating, you'll be able to fit about the same number of people in both the Jeep Wrangler and the Mazda CX-50.
With the Jeep Wrangler, you'll be able to haul more equipment or luggage than the Mazda CX-50.