2025 Mazda
|
2025 Mitsubishi
|
|
| MPG - City | 22 - 26 MPG | 24 MPG |
| MPG - Hwy | 30 - 33 MPG | 30 - 31 MPG |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Cargo Space | 45.2 ft3 | 64.3 ft3 |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic | Continuously Variable |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | Four Wheel Drive, Front Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 191 - 227 hp | 181 hp |
| Towing Capacity | Info not available | 2,000 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 173.0 in | 185.8 in |
| Exterior Width | 70.7 in | 84.4 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 36.3 in |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.9 in |
| Head Room |
Front 37.8 - 38.1 in
Rear 38.3 in |
Front 40.6 in
Rear 39.1 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
Passengers in the backseat will be able to stretch out a lot more in the Mitsubishi Outlander than in the Mazda CX-30, due to its greater head- and legroom.
The Mitsubishi Outlander will be a hit with tall drivers and their front seat passengers, since it has greater front head- and legroom than the Mazda CX-30.
Convenience
You'll be making about the same number of stops at the gas station with the Mazda CX-30 as you will with the Mitsubishi Outlander, as they are both able to travel similar distances on a tank of gas.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). When looking only at MSRP, the Mazda CX-30 will have less of an impact on your bank account than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Dimensions
Since the Mazda CX-30 is much slimmer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, it'll be much easier to find a wide enough space in a crowded parking lot.
If you go with the Mazda CX-30, you'll have a much easier time finding a large enough space to park than you will with the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Handling
The Mazda CX-30 has a smaller turning radius than the Mitsubishi Outlander, allowing you to more easily maneuver in and out of tight spots.
Performance
The Mazda CX-30 has a little more horsepower than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
Powertrain
With similar torque, the Mazda CX-30 and the Mitsubishi Outlander are about even in transmitting their respective horsepower to the wheels.
Utility
The Mazda CX-30 has less seating than the Mitsubishi Outlander, making the Mitsubishi Outlander the better choice, if you need to chauffeur many passengers.
The Mazda CX-30 has significantly less cargo capacity than the Mitsubishi Outlander.