2024 Land Rover
|
2025 Mazda
|
|
| MPG - City | 20 MPG | 39 MPG |
| MPG - Hwy | 27 MPG | Info not available |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space | 50.5 ft3 | 89.2 ft3 |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic | Continuously Variable |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 246 hp | 219 hp |
| Towing Capacity | 3,968 lbs | 1,500 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 172.1 in | 186.1 in |
| Exterior Width | 78.6 in | 75.6 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 40.0 in
Rear 33.8 in |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 37.8 in |
| Head Room |
Front 38.9 in
Rear 38.3 in |
Front 38.6 - 39.1 in
Rear 36.7 - 37.8 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
Passengers in the backseat will be able to stretch out a lot more in the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid than in the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, due to its greater head- and legroom.
The Mazda CX-50 Hybrid offers just a little more front head- and legroom than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, offering the driver and front passenger a bit more room and comfort.
Convenience
The Mazda CX-50 Hybrid requires fewer stops at the gas station than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, making it more convenient to drive.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque will definitely make more of a dent in your wallet than the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid, which has a much lower MSRP.
Dimensions
Since the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is much wider than the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid, finding a wide enough spot in a parking lot may be a bit more challenging.
If you go with the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, you'll have a much easier time finding a large enough space to park than you will with the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid.
Handling
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a larger turning radius than the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid, making it slightly more difficult to maneuver in and out of tight spots.
Performance
When considering towing capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly the choice over the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid for pulling heavy loads.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a little more horsepower than the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid.
Powertrain
Due to its much higher torque, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque does a much better job of transmitting its engine's horsepower to its wheels than the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid.
Utility
In terms of seating, you'll be able to fit about the same number of people in both the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid.
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has significantly less cargo capacity than the Mazda CX-50 Hybrid.