2025 Mazda
|
2025 Subaru
|
|
| MPG - City | 23 - 24 MPG | 25 - 26 MPG |
| MPG - Hwy | 28 MPG | 32 - 33 MPG |
| Seating Capacity | 6 - 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Cargo Space | 74.2 - 75.2 ft3 | 69.1 - 74.4 ft3 |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic | Continuously Variable |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 280 - 340 hp | 180 - 182 hp |
| Towing Capacity | 3,500 - 5,000 lbs | 1,500 - 3,000 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 201.6 in | 182.7 - 183.3 in |
| Exterior Width | 77.6 in | 72.0 - 72.2 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.4 in |
Front 43.3 in
Rear 39.4 in |
| Head Room |
Front 39.2 - 39.7 in
Rear 38.4 - 39.3 in |
Front 40.0 - 41.2 in
Rear 37.6 - 39.6 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
The Mazda CX-90 offers rear passengers about the same room to stretch out as the Subaru Forester, with comparable head- and legroom.
The Subaru Forester will be a hit with tall drivers and their front seat passengers, since it has greater front head- and legroom than the Mazda CX-90.
Convenience
You'll be making about the same number of stops at the gas station with the Mazda CX-90 as you will with the Subaru Forester, as they are both able to travel similar distances on a tank of gas.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). The Mazda CX-90 will definitely make more of a dent in your wallet than the Subaru Forester, which has a much lower MSRP.
Dimensions
Since the Mazda CX-90 is much wider than the Subaru Forester, finding a wide enough spot in a parking lot may be a bit more challenging.
If you go with the Mazda CX-90, you may be circling the block looking for a space large enough to park more often than with the Subaru Forester.
Handling
The Mazda CX-90 has a significantly larger turning radius than the Subaru Forester, making it much more difficult to maneuver in and out of tight spots.
Performance
When considering towing capacity, the Mazda CX-90 is clearly the choice over the Subaru Forester for pulling heavy loads.
When it comes to horsepower, the Mazda CX-90 greatly out-muscles the Subaru Forester.
Powertrain
Due to its much higher torque, the Mazda CX-90 does a much better job of transmitting its engine's horsepower to its wheels than the Subaru Forester.
Utility
The Mazda CX-90 offers greater seating capacity than the Subaru Forester, making it a better choice for those who find themselves chauffeuring others around.
The Mazda CX-90 has a roomier cargo area for putting your bags or other items than the Subaru Forester.