2025 Mazda
|
2025 Subaru
|
|
MPG - City | 23 - 25 MPG | 21 - 26 MPG |
MPG - Hwy | 29 - 31 MPG | 26 - 32 MPG |
Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Cargo Space | 56.3 ft3 | 75.6 ft3 |
Engine |
|
|
Transmission | Automatic | Continuously Variable |
Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | All Wheel Drive |
Horsepower | 187 - 227 hp | 182 - 260 hp |
Towing Capacity | 2,000 - 3,500 lbs | 2,700 - 3,500 lbs |
Exterior Length | 185.8 in | 191.3 - 191.9 in |
Exterior Width | 75.6 in | 74.2 - 74.6 in |
Leg Room |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.8 in |
Front 42.8 in
Rear 39.5 in |
Head Room |
Front 38.6 - 39.1 in
Rear 37.5 - 38.6 in |
Front 39.1 - 40.1 in
Rear 39.1 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
Passengers in the back seat may find themselves a little more cramped in the Mazda CX-50 than the Subaru Outback.
The Subaru Outback offers just a little more front head- and legroom than the Mazda CX-50, offering the driver and front passenger a bit more room and comfort.
Convenience
You'll be making about the same number of stops at the gas station with the Mazda CX-50 as you will with the Subaru Outback, as they are both able to travel similar distances on a tank of gas.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). When looking only at MSRP, the Mazda CX-50 will have less of an impact on your bank account than the Subaru Outback.
Dimensions
The Mazda CX-50 is a little wider than the Subaru Outback, so getting in and out of the car in a crowded parking lot may be a little more of a squeeze.
The Mazda CX-50 is slightly shorter than the Subaru Outback, which may make it easier to park.
Handling
The Mazda CX-50 has the same turning radius as the Subaru Outback, so they both maneuver the same in and out of tight spots.
Performance
In terms of towing capacity, the Subaru Outback is clearly the choice over the Mazda CX-50 for pulling heavy loads.
When it comes to horsepower, the Mazda CX-50 has a lot less horsepower than the Subaru Outback.
Powertrain
The Mazda CX-50 has much lower torque than the Subaru Outback, which generally means that it won't feel as fast or powerful.
Utility
In terms of seating, you'll be able to fit about the same number of people in both the Mazda CX-50 and the Subaru Outback.
The Mazda CX-50 has significantly less cargo capacity than the Subaru Outback.