2025 Mazda
|
2024 Mitsubishi
|
|
| MPG - City | 23 - 25 MPG | Info not available |
| MPG - Hwy | 29 - 31 MPG | Info not available |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Cargo Space | 56.3 ft3 | 64.3 ft3 |
| Engine |
|
|
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Drivetrain | All Wheel Drive | Four Wheel Drive |
| Horsepower | 187 - 227 hp | 248 hp |
| Towing Capacity | 2,000 - 3,500 lbs | 1,500 lbs |
| Exterior Length | 185.8 in | 185.4 in |
| Exterior Width | 75.6 in | 84.4 in |
| Leg Room |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 39.8 in |
Front 41.7 in
Rear 38.1 in |
| Head Room |
Front 38.6 - 39.1 in
Rear 37.5 - 38.6 in |
Front 39.8 - 40.6 in
Rear 37.4 - 39.1 in |
*MSRP and Invoice prices displayed are for educational purposes only, do not reflect the actual selling price of a particular vehicle, and do not include applicable gas taxes or destination charges.
Comfort
The Mazda CX-50 offers rear passengers about the same room to stretch out as the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, with comparable head- and legroom.
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV will be a hit with tall drivers and their front seat passengers, since it has greater front head- and legroom than the Mazda CX-50.
Cost
There are a lot of factors to consider when calculating the overall cost of a vehicle. The main consideration is Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP). Clearly, the Mazda CX-50 is a better financial choice over the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, when considering MSRP.
Dimensions
Since the Mazda CX-50 is much slimmer than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, it'll be much easier to find a wide enough space in a crowded parking lot.
When looking at overall length, the Mazda CX-50 takes up about the same amount of space in your garage as the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
Handling
The Mazda CX-50 has the same turning radius as the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, so they both maneuver the same in and out of tight spots.
Performance
When considering towing capacity, the Mazda CX-50 is clearly the choice over the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV for pulling heavy loads.
When it comes to horsepower, the Mazda CX-50 has a lot less horsepower than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
Powertrain
Due to its much higher torque, the Mazda CX-50 does a much better job of transmitting its engine's horsepower to its wheels than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
Utility
The Mazda CX-50 has less seating than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, making the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV the better choice, if you need to chauffeur many passengers.
The Mazda CX-50 has less cargo space than the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV, which is okay if you don't need to move a lot in one trip.